Fitososyolojik Çalışmalarda Karakter Türlerin Sayısal Metotlarla Belirlenmesi

Behlul Guler, Emin UĞURLU

Öz


Bitki kommunitelerinde karekter türlerin seçimi fitososyolojik sınıflandırma sisteminde önemlidir. Karekter türler ülkemizde yapılan fitososyoloji çalışmalarında büyük oranda  Braun-Blanquet yöntemine göre belirlenmektedir. Bu yöntemin bazı subjektif yanlarından dolayı son yıllarda karekter türlerin belirlenmesinde sayısal ölçümler geliştirilmiştir. Bu makalede bu ölçümlerden bazıları karşılaştırmalı olarak verilmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler


Bitki sosyolojisi, Kommunite, Sadakat, Karakter tür

Tam Metin:

PDF Uzak

Referanslar


Weber, H.E., Moravec, J. & Theurillat, J.-P., International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 3rd edition, Journal of Vegetation Science, 11: 739-768 [2000].

Barbour, Michael G.; Jack H. Burk; Wanna D. Pitts, Frank S. Gilliam; Mark W. Schwartz. Terrestrial Plant Ecology (Third Edition ed.). Addison Wesley Longman [1999].

Kılınç, M., Bitki Sosyolojisi, Palme Kitabevi, Ankara [2008].

Bruelheide, H. A., New measure of fidelity and its application to defining species groups. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 167-178 [2000].

Dengler, J., Chytrý, M., Ewald, J., Phytosociology. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Encyclopedia of ecology. Oxford: Elsevier; [2008]. p. 2767-2779. [General Ecology; vol 4] [2008].

Braun-Blanquet, J., Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer, Berlin, DE [1928].

Braun–Blanquet, J., Plant Sociology. [transl. by G. D. Fuller and H. S. Conard], New York, xviii + 439 pp [1932].

Braun-Blanquet, J., Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde Springer, New York, NY, US [1964].

Szafer, W. & Pawłowski, B., Die Pflanzenassoziationen des Tatra-Gebirges. Bemerkungen über die angewandte Arbeitstechnik. Bull. Int. Acad. Polon. Sci. Lettres B 3, Suppl. 2: 1-12 [1927].

Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel, E., The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R.H. [ed.] Ordination and classification of plant communities, pp. 617-737. W. Junk, The Hague, NL [1973].

Dierschke, H., Pflanzensoziologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE [1994].

Kent M.,& Coker P., Vegetation Description and Analysis, Belhaven Press, London [1992].

Bergmeier, E., Härdtle, W., Mierwald, U., Nowak, B. & Peppler, C., Vorschläge zur syntaxonomischen Arbeitsweise in der Pflanzensoziologie. Kiel. Not. Pflanzenk. Schleswig- Holst. Hamburg 20: 92-103 [1990].

Barkman, J.J., Fidelity and character-species, a critical evaluation. Vegetatio 85: 105-116 [1989].

Brisse, H., De Ruffray, P., Grandjouan, G. & Hoff, M., The Phytosociological Database ‘SOPHY’. Part I: Calibration of indicator plants. Part II: Socio-ecological classification of relevés. Ann. Bot. [Roma] 53: 177-190 [1995].

De Cáceres, M., Font, X. & Oliva, F., Assessing species diagnostic value in large data sets: A comparison between phi-coefficient and Ochiai index, Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 779-788 [2008].

Kusbach, A., Long, J. N., Van Miegroet, H., & Shultz, L. M. Fidelity and diagnostic species concepts in vegetation classification in the Rocky Mountains, northern Utah, USA. Botany, 90[8], 678-693, [2012].

Lötter, M.C., Mucina, L. & Witkowski, E.T.F., The classification conundrum: species fidelity as leading criterion in search of a rigorous method to classify a complex forest data set. Community Ecology, 14, 121–132 [2013]

Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Holt, J. & Botta-Dukát, Z., Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79-90 [2002].

Bruelheide, H., Die Grünlandgesellschaften des Harzes und ihre Standortsbedingungen. Mit einem Beitrag zum Gliederungsprinzip auf der Basis von statistisch ermittelten Artengruppen. Diss. Bot. 244: 1-338 [1995].

Goodall, D.W., Objective methods for the classification of vegetation II. Fidelity and indicator value. Aust. J. Bot. 1: 434-456 [1953].

Juhász-Nagy, P., Some theoretical models of cenological fidelity I. Acta Biol. Debrec. 3: 33-43 [1964].

Botta-Dukát, Z. & Borhidi, A., New objective method for calculating fidelity. Example: The Illyrian beechwoods. Ann. Bot. [Roma] 57: 73-90 [1999].

Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P., Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345-366 [1997].

Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J., Biometry. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY, US [1995].

Tichý Lubomír & Chytrý Milan, Analysis and Classification of Ecological Data Using the JUICE software, Stellenbosch Course Notes [2008].

Tichy, Lubomir & Holt, J., JUICE, Program for Management, Analysis and Classification of Ecological Data, Program Manual [2006].

Willner, W., Syntaxonomische Revision der südmitteleuropaischen Buchenwalder. Phytocoenologia [2002].

Willner, W., Tichý, L., and Chytrý, M., Effects of different fidelity measures and contexts on the determination of diagnostic species J. Veg. Sci. 20[1]: 130–137 [2009].

Hennekens, S. M., TURBO[VEG]. Software package for input, processing and presentation of phytosociological data. User’s guide. Instituut voor Bos en Natuur, Wageningen and Unit of Vegetation Science, University of Lancester, 57 pp, Lancester [1996].

Hennekens, S.M. & Schaminée, J.H.J., TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 589-591 [2001].

Tichý, L., JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451-453 [2002].

Tichý Lubomír & Chytrý Milan, Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size J. Veg. Sci. 17: 809–818 [2006].

De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Wiser SK, Brotons L., Using species combinations in indicator value analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution [2012].


Madde Ölçümleri

Ölçüm Çağırılıyor ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.